Unfortunately, MSC homing is inefficient, with only a small percentage of cells reaching the target tissue following systemic administration

Unfortunately, MSC homing is inefficient, with only a small percentage of cells reaching the target tissue following systemic administration. for improving MSC homing, including genetic modification, cell surface engineering, priming of MSCs, and in particular, ultrasound techniques, which have AZ505 recently gained significant interest. Contextualizing these strategies within the multistep homing model emphasizes that our ability to optimize this process hinges on our understanding of its molecular mechanisms. Moving forward, it AZ505 is only with a combined effort of basic biology and translational work that the potential of MSC-based therapies can be realized. is facilitated by selectins expressed by endothelial cells. MSCs express CD44, which catches onto the selectins and causes the cell to begin rolling along the vasculature wall (Sackstein et?al., 2008). The exact selectin used by MSCs is still an active area of investigation, especially because they express neither the hematopoietic cell E- and L-selectin ligand (HCELL) nor the P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) (Sackstein et?al., 2008). To model the tethering process, Rster et?al. constructed a parallel plate flow chamber seeded with endothelial cells (Ruster et?al., 2006). They demonstrated that anti-P-selectin antibodies suppress MSC binding to endothelial cells, whereas immobilized P-selectin is sufficient to induce MSC or through the interstitium to the site of injury. This step is guided by chemotactic signals released in response to tissue damage. MSCs migrate toward various signals, including the AZ505 growth factors platelet-derived growth factor-AB and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, and to a lesser extent, the chemokines RANTES, MDC, and SDF-1 (Ponte et?al., 2009). Preincubating the MSCs with tumor AZ505 necrosis factor (TNF)- increases their migration toward chemokines by upregulating their receptors CCR2, CCR3, and CCR4. The inflammatory chemokine interleukin (IL)-8 may promote migration of MSCs to injured sites (Bi et?al., Rabbit polyclonal to AQP9 2014, Bayo et?al., 2017) and also stimulates them to secrete regenerative factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (Hou et?al., 2014). Detailed knowledge of the molecular events facilitating MSC homing immediately presents a variety of strategies for optimizing the process for therapeutic purposes. Improving MSC Homing One of the biggest challenges facing MSC therapies is improving their homing efficiency. The percentage of intravenously (i.v.) administered MSCs that reach the target tissue is in the low single digits, as demonstrated by various imaging studies (Devine et?al., 2003, Barbash et?al., 2003, Kraitchman et?al., 2005). What causes this low homing efficiency? At least part of the reason is physiological: i.v.-administered MSCs get trapped in the lung capillaries (Scarfe et?al., 2018). Indeed, vasodilators and anticoagulants like heparin reduce lung trapping and increase MSC homing to other sites like the liver and bone marrow (Gao et?al., 2001, Yukawa et?al., 2012). The process of homing, however, is fundamentally based on specific molecular interactions, not passive dissemination. It may be the case that the expression of homing molecules, like CXCR4, is just too low on MSCs (Wynn et?al., 2004, Von Luttichau et?al., 2005). It has also been observed that the expansion of MSCs gradually leads to the loss in expression of homing molecules (Honczarenko et?al., 2006, Rombouts and Ploemacher, 2003). To remedy these problems, a variety of approaches have been taken to improve MSC homing (Figure?2). These strategies can be broadly AZ505 categorized into seven approaches: (1) targeted administration, (2) magnetic guidance, (3) genetic modification, (4) cell surface engineering, (5) priming, and (6) modification of the target tissue, and (7) radiotherapeutic techniques (Table 1). Open in a separate window Figure?2 Strategies for improving Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Homing Overview of the various strategies that have been employed to improve mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) homing, organized by which step it targets. Arrows indicate upregulation. Table 1 Overview of Strategies Targeting Each Step of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Homing system, Kobayashi et?al. were able to target magnetically labeled MSCs onto an osteochondral defect in the knee joint, with the use of an external magnetic field (Kobayashi et?al., 2008). Using an rat model, Yanai et?al. were able to target magnetically labeled MSCs to the retina following both intravitreal or i.v. administration, with the assistance of an external magnet placed in the orbit of the rat (Yanai et?al., 2012). The rats with the external magnet had significantly higher retinal levels of anti-inflammatory molecules (IL-10) and growth factors (hepatocyte growth factor.